The High Court of Orissa, Cuttack, disposed of the writ petition for want of instructions from the petitioner's counsel, but granted liberty to approach the forum again if a cause of action survives.
Liberty granted to petitioners to approach the appropriate forum if any cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.26050 of 2013
Patil Construction and …. Petitioners Infrastructure Ltd. and another
Mr. P.K. Parhi, S.S. Kashyap, K.C. Jena, Advocates -versus…. Secretary, Works Department and Opposite Parties others
Mr. A.K. Mishra, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
Order No.
06.01.2022
(DR. B.R. Sarangi)
Judge
(S.K. Panigrahi)
Judge
pcd
Page 1 of 1
Patil Construction and Infrastructure Ltd.
Secretary, Works Department
B.R. Sarangi
S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
