Disposed

Anjana Mohapatra v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC18 Jan 2022WP(C)/34167/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed writ petition against an order declaring special audit report negativing her request. Court found petition premature as petitioner has scope to respond to show cause notice before authority. Writ allowed not entertained; given opportunity to respond. Case disposed of as not entertained.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner given opportunity to file response to show cause notice within ten days; petition not entertained at this stage.

Anjana Mohapatra Vs State of Odisha — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No.34167 of 2021

¶3

Anjana Mohapatra

¶4

Petitioner

¶5

Mr.B.Samantaray, Advocate

¶6

- Versus-

¶7

State of Odisha & Ors. ….. Opposite parties Mr.D.K.Mishra, AGA Mr.Dayananda Mohapatra, Advocate (For O.P.Nos.2, 3 and 4)

¶8

CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH

¶9

Order No. 01

¶10

ORDER 18.01.2022 1 . This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing Mode. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Undisputedly the impugned order at page-9 while disclosing negativing the request of the petitioner on the premises his name is found in the special audit report, the Cuttack Development Authority appears given a chance to the petitioner to respond through the very same letter. Petitioner instead of clarifying his position before the authority has rushed to this Court. For the petitioner has a clear scope, this Court finds the writ petition at this stage is premature. While declining to entertain the writ petition at this stage, this Court observes in the event the dispute involved herein is still pending consideration, it will be open to the petitioner to attempt to file response to the show cause notice vide Annexure-1

¶11

at page-9 to the brief with proof, if any, at least within a period of ten days and in such event the same shall be considered and disposed of by undertaking the entire exercise within a period of six weeks from the ate of submission of the response and also giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

¶12

As restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout copy of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25^th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798, dated 15^th April, 2021 and Court’s Office order circulated vide Memo Nos.514 & 515 dated

¶13

7 th January, 2022.
“ (BISWANATH RATH)
JUDGE

Anjana Mohapatra v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anjana Mohapatra v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Susanta Kumar Mohanta Vs Arti Ahuja, Principal Secy.Health and Family Welfare Department

Iswar Chandra Jena Vs Ranjana Chopra, Comm.-Cum-Secy., S and M.E. Department

Lalit Mohan Panda Vs Ranjana Chopra, Comm.-Cum-Secy., S and M.E. Department

Media Care Vs State of Odisha

Pradeep Kumar Das Vs Bm, Vijaya Bank, Baripada

Pranati Misra Vs Dr.Debasis Misra