ORDER 18.01.2022 1 . This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing Mode. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3. There is no denial by Mr.Lenka, learned counsel for the petitioner that the cheque involved was ultimately returned to the depositor by its bank on the endorsement that there is a mistake in transaction in spite of there is no sufficient money in the payer’s account. In the circumstance and for bonafide action of the Bank, in releasing money in favour of the beneficiary and after coming know that there was illegal debitence requiring release of such debitance. The action of the Banker since involves a bonafide action, no application against the Bank would have been entertained by the permanent Lok Adaklat. It is at this stage of the matter, Mr.Lenka, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wants not to pursue this writ petition in order to avail the remedy available under other