Petitioner sought to quash the rejection of his tender application for non-compliance of IT return submission. Petitioner offered to withdraw the writ with liberty to pursue remedy before the appropriate authority.
Withdrawal of the writ petition. Liberty granted to pursue remedy before the appropriate authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 31066 of 2022
R.J. Bharat Kumar
Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Rath, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha and others
….. Opposite Parties
Mr. P.P. Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
22.12.2022
Page 1 of 2
rightly and judiciously rejected the tender application of the petitioner since the petitioner has not complied the conditions of the tender. Learned counsel for the petitioner however fairly contended that the petitioner has not submitted the bank guarantee, but had submitted the IT returns for the financial year 2020-21, however, the requirement of the corrigendum is that he had to file the IT return for the financial year 2021-22, which the petitioner had not filed.
Arun
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(B. P. SATAPATHY)
JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.J. Bharat Kumar
State of Odisha
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
