The High Court of Orissa allowed the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file a better application with better particulars. No substantive order on merits was passed.
Petition withdrawn with liberty to file a better application with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 28689 of 2022
NHAI, Sundergarh
….. Petitioner
Mr.A.Das, Advocate
Vs. ….. Tata Sponge Iron Pvt., Ltd., Opposite Parties Keonjhar & Another
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
22.12.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
01.
2. Mr. A.Das, learned counsel for the Petitioner after advancing
some arguments, he wants to withdraw the Writ Petition with
liberty to file a better application with better particulars.
3. With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petition stands disposed
of.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Arun/subrat (B. P. SATAPATHY)
JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
NHAI, Sundergarh
Tata Sponge Iron Pvt. Ltd.
B.R. Sarangi
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
