Disposed

Kerala State Electronics Development Corp.Ltd., Kerala v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC7 Dec 2022WP(C)/31230/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition relating to public works execution and representation consideration. The Court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-14 and pass appropriate order within four weeks.

Kerala State Electronics Development Corp.Ltd… — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P (C) No. 31230 of 2022

¶3

Kerala State Electronics Development Corp., Ltd. Kerala

¶4

….. Petitioner

¶5

Mr. B.K.Das, Advocate

¶6

Vs.

¶7

….. State of Odisha & Others Opposite Parties Mr. H.M.Dhal, AGA

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

¶10

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

07.12.2022

Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

¶16

2. Heard.

¶17

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:-

¶18

“ It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to pass appropriate order/direction to Opp. Parties to take steps to resolve the issue within a stipulated time period keeping in view the observation and order passed by this Hon’ble Court dt.18.3.2019. Further a directioin be issued to Opp. parties to allow the petitioner to execute the work, keeping in view his experience with latest Technology, without escalating the price; The order/decision issued by Opp. Party No.3 dt.04.12.2021 be quashed as non speaking one and has been passed without providing any reason”.

¶19

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.2 vide Annexure-14 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.

¶20

Page 1 of 2

¶21

5 . As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-14, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶22

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

¶23

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE

¶24

Subrat

¶25

(B. P. SATAPATHY)
JUDGE

¶26

Page 2 of 2

Kerala State Electronics Development Corp.Ltd., Kerala v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kerala State Electronics Development Corp.Ltd., Kerala v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Mdsg Construction Pvt. Ltd., Nuapada Vs State of Odisha

Raghumani Harijan @ Raghunath Domb Vs State of Odisha

Pruthwiraj Patra Vs State of Odisha

M/S. Fast Communication Vs State of Orissa

Thakit Kujur Vs Collector and District Magistrate, Jharsuguda

Omm Construction, Angul Vs Union of India