The High Court of Orissa decided not to entertain a writ petition seeking quashing of a tender and directions for an independent inquiry, permitting the petitioner to pursue remedies post-enquiry.
Petitioner permitted to pursue remedies after the enquiry is completed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 31228 of 2022
Omm Construction, Angul
….. Petitioner
Mr.S.K.Das, Advocate
Vs.
….. Union of India & Others Opposite Parties
Mr. D.R.Bhokta, C.G.C
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
07.12.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 01.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Alok/Subrat
(B. P. SATAPATHY) JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court is inclined to quash a tender pending investigation and issue directions for an independent inquiry.
Omm Construction
Union of India
B.R. Sarangi
Biraja Prasantha Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
