The High Court of Orissa dismissed a writ petition filed by M/s. Fast Communication claiming payment for videography services. The Court held the claim arises from a contract and directed the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum.
Liberty granted to pursue remedy before the appropriate forum; Writ Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 30398 of 2022
M/s. Fast Communication
….. Petitioner
Mr.S.K.Nayak-3, Advocate
Vs.
….. State of Odisha & Others Opposite Parties
Mr. S.Jena, S.C. S & ME Department
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
07.12.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 01. 2. Heard Mr. S.K.Nayak-3, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. S.Jena, learned S.C. S & ME Department.
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
However, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to pursue his remedy before the appropriate forum.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Alok/Subrat
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a writ petition seeking payment for videography services done under a contractual agreement.
Whether the claim arising from a contract is maintainable in a writ jurisdiction.
M/s. Fast Communication
State of Odisha & Others
DR. B.R. SARANGI
B. P. SATAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
