The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack dismissed the writ petition following a connected judgment. It directed the petitioner-MCL to comply with a direction of the Collector, Angul, within three months.
Petitioner-MCL directed to comply with Collector's order dated 30.11.2016 within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No. 19886 of 2017
General Manager, MCL, Jagannath ….. Petitioner Area
Mr. B.N. Mohanty, Advocate
Vs.
Collector, Angul & Anr.
….. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Muduli, AGA (O.P.No.1) Mr.B.C. Panda, Adv. (O.P.No.2)
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE B.P. SATAPATHY
ORDER 22.12.2022
Order No.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
GDS
(B.P. SATAPATHY) JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be decided on merits or disposed of in analogy to a connected writ petition.
Whether directions given by the Collector, Angul in Misc. Case Nos. 1 to 43 of 2015 must be complied with.
General Manager, MCL, Jagannath
Collector, Angul
Collector, Angul & Anr.
Dr. Justice B.R. Sarangi
Mr. Justice B.P. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
