The High Court of Orissa, Cuttack, permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition after the counsel stated lack of proper instruction from the client, with liberty to approach the court in exigency if any.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Court in appropriat time in the event of any exigency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.3030 of 2022
Subas Mandal
Petitioner(s)
Mr. L. Pradhan, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
…. Opposite Party(s)
Mr. R.P. Mahapatra, Additional Govt. Adv.
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
07.03.2022
Order No.
1. Mr. Pradhan, learned counsel for Petitioner says that he has not taken proper instruction from the client and has hurriedly filed this writ petition. In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition at this stage. However, considering the request made by Mr. Pradhan, learned counsel for Petitioner, this Court permits the Petitioner to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach this Court in appropriate time, in the event of any exigency.
2. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn, but with liberty as prayed for.
(Biswanath Rath)
Judge
Ayaskanta Jena
Page 1 of 1
Subas Mandal
State of Odisha
Biswanath Rath
Ayaskanta Jena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
