Writ petition praying to quash work orders and direct execution through Panchayat Sabhas. Court directed opposite party to consider pending representation and decide within three months, disposing the petition without substantive opinion on the claim.
Directed opposite party to consider pending representation and take lawful decision within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.3006 of 2022
Arjun Mohapatra
Petitioner(s)
Mr. G.N. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha & Ors. Opposite Parties
Mr. R.P. Mahapatra, Addl. Govt. Adv.
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
07.03.2022
Order No.
1. This writ petition involves the following prayer:
“Therefore prays that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue notice to the opposite parties and after hearing both the parties this Hon’ble Court further be pleased to issue writ/direction :-
(i) To quash the work orders issued by op. no.4 under Annexure 2 to construct the GP office and quarter.
(ii) To the opposite party no.4 to pass an order to execute the works under annexure-2 through Palli sabha as per the resolution and guidelines under Annexure-1. And
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
2. Considering the submissions made by the parties and as a representation at the instance of the Petitioner on the selfsame issue is still pending before the Opposite Party No.3, this Court without expressing any opinion on the claim of the Petitioner, directs the Opposite Party No.3 to consider the representation at the instance of the Petitioner vide Annexure-5 and take a lawful decision in the matter taking into account the grounds stated in this writ petition so also the documents appended thereto.
3. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of communication of an authenticated copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition by the Petitioner.
Ayaskanta Jena
4. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above order.
(Biswanath Rath)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
ARJUN MOHAPATRA
STATE OF ODISHA
BISWANATH RATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
