The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by directing the opposite party to consider the petitioner's representation regarding the scale of pay, referring to specific orders and judgments within a stipulated period.
Direction to Opposite Party No. 4 to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate order within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) No. 27875 of 2022
Manjushree Pradhan ….. Petitioner Mr. D.N. Mishra, Advocate
Vs.
….. Union of India and others Opposite parties
Mr. B.S. Rayaguru, CGC, Mr. S.N. Nayak, ASC and Mr. J.K. Mishra, Advocate (O.P.2)
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER 22.11.2022
01
Page 1 of 2
(OAB) No. 3 of 2012 and judgment dated 18.04.2022 passed in W.P.(C) No. 26692 of 2011, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.
Arun
(DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the opposite party is directed to consider the petitioner's representation regarding the scale of pay admissible under UGC guidelines.
Manjushree Pradhan
Union of India
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
