The High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition without expressing an opinion on merits. The court directed the opposite party to decide on the petitioner's representation regarding engagement as a Hindi Teacher within three months.
Order to opposite party no.2 to decide on petitioner's representation within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 27416 of 2022
Harekrushna Nayak
….. Petitioner Mr. B. Satapathy, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha and others
….. Opposite parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
21.11.2022
01
Ashok
(DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition to quash the order and direct engagement as Hindi Teacher should be disposed of without expressing an opinion on merits.
Harekrushna Nayak
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
