This High Court disposed of a writ petition by directing the competent authority to dispose of the petitioner's case within two months, applying the decision principle from Ashok Kumar Mohapatra confirmed by the apex Court.
Directed competent authority to dispose of petitioner's case applying Ashok Kumar Mohapatra decision within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P. (C) No. 27681 of 2022
Basudev Behera
….. Petitioner
Mr. B.Paramguru, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha and Others
Opposite parties
Mr. S. Jena, SC, S&ME Deptt
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
21.11.2022
01
4 Learned counsel for both the parties agreed that the issue involved in this writ petition is analogues to one involved in O.A. No. 1668 of 2017 ( Ashok Kumar Mohapatra v. State of Orissa ), which was disposed of by the Odisha Administrative Tribunal vide judgment dated 09.10.2018 and confirmed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.6698 of 2020 and further confirmed by the apex Court in SLP(C) No.15573 of 2020.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)
Arun (s)
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitioner's case should be disposed of applying the precedent set in Ashok Kumar Mohapatra.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ashok Kumar Mohapatra v. State of OrissaRelied on¶18
O.A. No. 1668 of 2017 (Ashok Kumar Mohapatra v. State of Orissa)
W.P.(C) No.6698 of 2020Relied on¶18
SLP(C) No.15573 of 2020Relied on¶18
Basudev Behera
State of Odisha and Others
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
