M/S.Jagannath Const. v. Eic,Works Dept.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition stood disposed of as infructuous due to the efflux of time as submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 24862 of 2014
….. Petitioner Mr. R. Roy, Adv. Vs. ….. Opposite parties State Counsel
M/s Jagannath Construction Company
Vs. Engineer-in-Chief Works Deptt. and ….. Opposite parties others
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
08.02.2022
Ashok
Page 1 of 1
Mr. R. Roy
M/s Jagannath Construction Company
Engineer-in-Chief Works Deptt.
State Counsel
B.R. SARANGI
S.K. PANIGRAHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court