Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Prasanta Ku.Apradhan Vs State — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2022)

Home
Orissa HC
2022
Prasanta Ku.Apradhan Vs StatePrasanta Ku.Apradhan v. State

Disposed

Prasanta Ku.Apradhan v. State

Orissa HC7 Feb 2022WP(C)/18427/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition disposed of as infructuous due to efflux of time on the hearing date. No substantive legal propositions decided.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 18427 of 2014

Prasanta Kumar Pradhan

….. Petitioner

Mr. Subir Palit, Advocate

Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

….. Opposite party

State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

ORDER

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Prasanta Kumar Pradhan
respondent
State of Odisha & Ors.

Coram

AI extract

B.R. Sarangi

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 7 Feb 2022 · February
Registered: 22 Sept 2014
Case no.: WP(C)/18427/2014

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from B.r.sarangi S.k. Panigrahi

Raghunath Sahu Vs State
19 Jan 2022
Nabin Pradhan Vs State of Odisha
12 Jan 2022
M/S.Sarda Mines Pvt.Ltd. Vs State of Odisha
12 Jan 2022
M/S.Shanti Vs All India Institute
7 Feb 2022

Cite this judgement

Prasanta Ku.Apradhan v. State, WP(C)/18427/2014 (OD), decided on 7 February 2022.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

B.R. Sarangi and S.K. Panigrahi

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Disposed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ petition held infructuous by reason of efflux of time and disposed of without further relief or principles laid down. No substantive adjudication on merits.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

07.02.2022

Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 6 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.

In view of the above, the writ petition is
disposed of as infructuous.

Alok

……………………... ( DR. B.R. SARANGI ) JUDGE

…………….…………..……. ( S.K. PANIGRAHI ) JUDGE

S.K. Panigrahi

CNR

ODHC010007302014

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

B.r.sarangi S.k. Panigrahi

Disposal

Disposed Off

Sanuja Begum Vs Eo,Bhadrak Municip

7 Feb 2022

Subash Ch.Padhi Vs State and Ors.

7 Feb 2022