Justice and colleagues dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to efflux of time without substantive adjudication on any legal question.
The writ petition is dismissed as it has been rendered infructuous due to efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.2195 of 2018
…. Prasanta Kumar Mohanty
Petitioner
Mr. B.P. Das, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. Debakanta Mohanty, A.G.A.
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
Order No.
S.K. Guin
ORDER
12.12.2022
1. By efflux of time, the present writ petition has been rendered
infructuous.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as such.
sd
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman)
Judge
Prasanta Kumar Mohanty
State of Odisha
Dr. S. Muralidhar
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
