This review petition disposed of a direction to the State of Odisha to pay the petitioner differential salary from the date of officiating as Headmaster till superannuation, following Supreme Court decisions.
Direction to opposite parties to pay petitioner differential salary from date of officiating as Headmaster till superannuation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RVWPET No.21 of 2019
Sibacharan Ray Mohapatra …. Petitioner
M/s. S.K. Nayak, Advocate and associates
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. D.R. Mohapatra, Senior Standing Counsel
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
Order No.
ORDER 09.12.2022
Page 1 of 2
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (M.S. Raman) Judge
S.K. Guin
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to differential salary from the date of officiating as Headmaster till superannuation based on Supreme Court precedents.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
A. Francis v. Management of Metropolitan Transport Corporation Tamil NaduFollowed¶11
A. Francis v. Management of Metropolitan Transport Corporation Tamil Nadu (2014) 13 SCC 383 · Who else cites this
State of Punjab v. Dharam PalFollowed¶11
State of Punjab v. Dharam Pal 2017 (2) ILR, Cuttack 728 (SC) · Who else cites this
Umakanta Rout v. State of OrissaReferred¶11
Umakanta Rout v. State of Orissa
Krushna Prasad Sahu v. State of OrissaReferred¶11
Krushna Prasad Sahu v. State of Orissa
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sibacharan Ray Mohapatra
State of Odisha
M.S. Raman
S.K. Guin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
