In a twenty-one-year-old revision matter with no substantive hearing or question of law framed, the Court held that entertaining the petitions would serve no purpose. The matters were disposed of by leaving all questions of law, if any, open for decision in a future appropriate case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
TREV Nos.117 and 229 of 2001
State of Odisha
…. Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Pradhan, A.S.C.
-versus-
M/s. National Seeds Corporation Ltd.
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER
Order No.
12.12.2022
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (M.S. Raman) Judge
S.K. Guin
2 issues framed by the court
Whether revision petitions should be entertained after 21 years of pendency without any substantive hearing or framing of questions.
Whether the court should dispose of the petitions by leaving questions of law open for a future appropriate case.
State of Odisha
M/s. National Seeds Corporation Ltd.
M.S. RAMAN
S.K. GUIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
