Disposed

Nabin Pradhan v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC12 Jan 2022WP(C)/37188/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court disposed of a writ petition without expressing an opinion on merits. The petitioner sought extension of a quarry lease. The Court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass an appropriate order within three months.

What did the court decide?

Directed opposite party no. 3 to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate order within three months.

Nabin Pradhan Vs State of Odisha — Service and Employment | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶3

W.P.(C) No. 37188 of 2021

¶4

Nabin Pradhan

¶5

Petitioner

¶6

Mr. T.P. Tripathy, Advocate Vs. ….. State of Odisha & Ors. Opposite Parties State Counsel

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

ORDER

12.01.2022

Order No.

mode.

This matter is taken up through video conferencing

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶16

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking

¶17

direction to opposite party no.3 to extend the lease for Sand Quary with respect to Jagdalpur,Jharbandh in his favour for 200 days, the period which the Quary could not be operated by the petitioner due to pandemic situation in spite of paying all Government dues, rent and royalty amount for that period.

¶18

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.3

¶19

Page 1 of 2

¶20

vide Annexure-2 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time to which learned State Counsel has no objection.

¶21

As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-2 and pass appropriate order within a period of three months from the date of production/communication of authenticated copy of this order.

¶22

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25^th March, 2020, as modified by Court’s notice no. 4798 dated 15^th April, 2021, and Court’s Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos.514 and 515 dated 7^th January, 2022.

Page 2 of 2

Alok

(S.K. PANIGRAHI) JUDGE

¶27

Page 1 of 2

¶28

Page 2 of 2

Nabin Pradhan v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nabin Pradhan v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep Kumar Dash Vs State of Odisha

Ganesh Sponge Pvt.Lt Vs State and Ors.

Hiranya Ku.Samantray Vs Chairman,P.P.T.

M/S.Sarda Mines Pvt.Ltd. Vs State of Odisha

Bichitra Kumar Baral Vs State of Odisha

State Vs Govt.of India