Petitioner sought judicial review regarding arbitration reference proceedings and arbitrator change. The court held the petition was unnecessary as the matter was sub judice under a Section 34 challenge to the award.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.17157 of 2022 (Through hybrid mode)
Adhar Fresh
…. Petitioner
Mr. D. Nanda, Advocate for Mr. B.C.Panda, Advocate
-versus-
…. Registry of Arbitration Centre, Opposite Parties Orissa and another
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER
Order No.
27.07.2022
01. 1. Mr. Nanda, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and
submits, his client filed the petition for judicial review of the reference proceeding and change of arbitrator. He submits, in the reference his client gave out information of filing of this writ petition, whereupon nil award was passed. His client, thereafter, challenged the award under section 34 in
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
petition. It accordingly is disposed of.
(Arindam Sinha) Judge
Prasant
Page 1 of 1
Adhar Fresh
Registry of Arbitration Centre, Opposite Parties Orissa
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
