Mukta Sahoo v. State of Orissa
Case brief
What is this about?
Court corrected a typographical error in a previous order by amending the compensation figure from Rs.3,00,000/- to Rs.5,00,000/- and deemed the correction incorporated.
What did the court decide?
Compensation figure in the impugned order amended from Rs. 3,00,000/- to Rs. 5,00,000/-
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.14766 of 2015 (Through hybrid mode)
Mukta Sahoo
…. Petitioner
Mr. A. K. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. R. N. Acharya, Standing Counsel for S & ME Deptt. Mr. B. Singh, Standing Counsel Mr. S. N. Das, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER
Order No.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mukta Sahoo
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
Arindam Sinha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court