This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
COPET No.39 of 2015
(Through Hybrid mode)
M/s. Shivshakti Oils Pvt. Ltd.
Petitioner
None
-versus-
Official Liquidator, Orissa High Court and another
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Patnaik, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER
26.07.2022
Order No.
“4. Mr. Hota, learned advocate appears on behalf of applicant and draws attention to annexure-9 being letter dated 24th July, 2010 to submit, demand of opposite party no.2 is against the Official Liquidator acting in interest of the company in liquidation.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
5. Mr. Hota will be heard on adjourned date on who has to pay transfer fees in respect of assignment of lease, the assignor or the assignee.”
2. Mr. Patnaik, learned advocate appears on behalf of opposite party no.2 and draws attention to order dated 26th April, 2022, in which there was record of submissions made by parties and a question formulated by Court, to be answered by applicant.
3. Absence of applicant gives rise to presumption that it does not have answer to the question, posed by said order. Adjournment is granted at instance of Court as last chance to applicant, with request upon Mr. Patnaik to communicate this order to learned advocate, who had appeared on behalf of applicant. It is made clear, in event applicant continues to go unrepresented on adjourned date or thereafter, the application is likely to be dismissed.
(Arindam Sinha) Judge
RKS
Page 2 of 2
M/s. Shivshakti Oils Pvt. Ltd.
Official Liquidator, Orissa High Court
another
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
