Disposed

Binati Sendha v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC10 Jun 2022WP(C)/14222/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition regarding employment under the Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy, the High Court of Orissa directed the Collector, Angul, to consider the petitioner's pending representation within four weeks after affording a hearing opportunity.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Collector, Angul to consider the petitioner's representation within four weeks after affording a hearing opportunity.

Binati Sendha Vs State of Odisha — Land Acquisition | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No.14222 of 2022

¶3

Binati Sendha

¶4

…. Petitioner

¶5

Mr. Samvit Mohanty, Advocate

¶6

-versus-

¶7

State of Odisha and …. Opp. Parties others

¶8

Mr. H.M. Dhal, Addl. Government Advocate

¶9

Order No.

¶10

¶11

CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
10.06.2022
This matter is taken up through Hybrid

¶12

arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State of Odisha.

¶13

In this Writ Petition, the petitioner Binati Sendha has prayed for a direction to the opposite parties to provide her employment under R & R Policy, 2006 for acquisition of land by M.C.L.

¶14

It is stated that ventilating her grievance, the petitioner has filed a representation before the Collector, Angul (opposite party no.2) since 11.03.2022 under Annexure-8 but the same has not yet been

¶15

// 2 //

¶16

considered and the concerned authority may be directed to consider the same in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

¶17

Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the prayer made in the writ petition regarding disposal of representation.

¶18

After going through the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the averments taken in the writ petition and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing the opposite party no.2- Collector, Angul to consider the representation of the petitioner under Annexure-8 within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.

¶19

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

¶20

(S.K. Sahoo)

¶21

( M.S. Raman) Vacation Judge

¶22

RKM

¶23

Page 2 of 2

Binati Sendha v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Binati Sendha v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradip Kumar Pradhan Vs State of Odisha

Ananta Kumar Patra Vs State of Odisha

Bijan Kumar Parida Vs State of Odisha

Pradip Kumar Pradhan Vs State of Odisha

M/S. Kbm Construction, Puri Vs State of Orissa

Prakash Roadlines Corp. Ltd. Vs Union of India