Disposed

M/S. Kbm Construction, Puri v. State of Orissa

Orissa HC10 Jun 2022WP(C)/14654/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment is a direct order in a writ petition seeking mandamus to direct the State and Superintending Engineer to consider petitions regarding release of security deposit at NABARD-assisted bridge project site within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to opposite parties to consider pending representations and dispose of matter within four weeks with opportunity of hearing.

M/S. Kbm Construction, Puri Vs State of Orissa — Service and Employment | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No.14654 of 2022

¶3

M/s KBM Construction …. Petitioner

¶4

Mr. Sukanta Kumar Dalai, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

State of Orissa and …. Opp. Parties Another

¶7

Mr.D.K. Mohanty,
Additional Government Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER
Order No.
10.06.2022
01. This matter is taken up through Hybrid
arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate.

¶9

This writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner with the following prayer:-

¶10

“It is therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition, issue a writ of mandamus directing the Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation of the petitioner forthwith and to extend the benefits thereof in terms of Office Memorandum dtd. 27.04.2021 & 31.12.2021 for the work “Construction of Bridge over Gobakund Cut at

¶11

// 2 //

¶12

its off taking point near village Gobakund under NABARD Assistance (RIDF-XXIV)” to secure ends of justice.”

¶13

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the representations dated 17.12.2021, 27.12.2021, 19.01.2022 and 12.02.2022 under Annexure-5 series have been submitted before the Superintending Engineer, Puri Irrigation Division, Puri (Opposite Party No.2) regarding construction of Bridge over Gabakund Cut at its off taking point near village Gabakund under NABARD Assistance RIDF-XXIV vide Agreement No. 108P1/18-19-Release of differential Security deposit, which have not yet been considered and direction may be issued to the said Opposite Party to consider and dispose of after giving opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner.

¶14

Learned counsel for the State submits that the Petitioner is not entitled for the relief as prayed for and therefore, the representations filed by the Petitioner are totally misconceived.

¶15

Be that as it may, if the said representations under Annexure-5 series are pending before the Opposite Party Nos. 3 & 4, the same shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner and communicate the result of such

¶16

Page 2 of 3

¶17

// 3 //

¶18

exercise to the Petitioner.

¶19

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

¶20

(S.K. Sahoo) Vacation Judge

¶21

(M.S. RAMAN) Vacation Judge

¶22

Aks

¶23

Page 3 of 3

M/S. Kbm Construction, Puri v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Kbm Construction, Puri v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradip Kumar Pradhan Vs State of Odisha

Ananta Kumar Patra Vs State of Odisha

Bijan Kumar Parida Vs State of Odisha

Pradip Kumar Pradhan Vs State of Odisha

Prakash Roadlines Corp. Ltd. Vs Union of India

M/S Kings of Wine,Cuttack Vs Chief Manager-Cum-Ao, Canara Bank, Bbsr