This writ petition stood disposed of for want of instructions from the petitioner. The interim order dated 09.02.2006 was vacated, and liberty was granted to approach the appropriate forum.
Writ petition disposed for want of instructions; interim order dated 09.02.2006 vacated; liberty granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 1412 of 2006
Satya Ranjan Purohit @ Satya Purohit
….. Petitioner
Mr. H.S. Mishra, Advocate
Vs.
Block Development Officer, ….. Opposite parties Birmaharajpur and another
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
07.01.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 06. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions in the matter. 3. In view of the above submission, this writ petition stands disposed of for want of instructions. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law, if any cause of action still survives. 4. Interim order passed on 09.02.2006 stands vacated. (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE Ashok (S.K. PANIGRAHI) JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
Satya Ranjan Purohit
Block Development Officer
B.R. Sarangi
S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
