Dismissed
Nata @Natabar Sutar v. Baidhar Sutar
Orissa HCWA/178/2008
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as no representative appeared for the appellants on the scheduled hearing date.
What did the court decide?
Writ appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
W.A. No. 178 of 2008
¶3
Nata@ Natabar Sutar and others
¶4
…. Appellants None
¶5
-versus-
¶6
Baidhar Sutar and others
¶7
…. Respondents
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
¶10
ORDER
Order No. 12.04.2022
02. 1. None appears for the Appellants.
2. The writ appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R. K. Pattanaik)
Judge
¶11
S. Behera
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Nata@ Natabar Sutar and others
- respondent
Baidhar Sutar and others
Coram
AI extract
R. K. Pattanaik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court