The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. None appeared for the petitioners. Learned counsel for the State stated the matter had become infructuous, and the Chief Justice dismissed the petition accordingly.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.11547 of 2015
Dipansu Kundu and others …. Petitioners Mr. S. Mohanty, Advocate -versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. D.K. Mohanty, AGA
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
11.04.2022
Order No.
05. 1. None appears for the Petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the State states that the matter has been
rendered infructuous.
3. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R. K. Pattanaik)
Judge
TUDU
Dipansu Kundu and others
State of Odisha and others
R. K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
