The High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to make a fresh representation and seek further remedies.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to make a fresh representation to the authorities named and to seek appropriate remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.38558 of 2021
Annapurna Sahu and another
…. Petitioners Mr. P.K. Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. D. Mohanty, AGA
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER 11.04.2022
Order No. 02. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to make a fresh representation to the authorities properly naming the persons in whose favour the allotment was made and to which the Petitioners have an objection and after following up on such representation to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R. K. Pattanaik) Judge
TUDU
Annapurna Sahu
State of Odisha
R. K. Pattanaik
S. Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
