State v. Orissa Road Transpor
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Cuttack dismissed a revival petition and the underlying sales tax revision due to an inordinate delay of 1822 days that remained unexplained.
What did the court decide?
Misc. Case for condonation of delay dismissed; STREV dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
STREV No.540 of 2008
State of Orissa represented through the …. Petitioner Commissioner of Sales Tax, Orissa, Cuttack
Mr. S.S. Padhy, Additional Standing Counsel -versus-
…. M/s Orissa Road Transport Opposite Party Corporation Ltd.
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER 20.06.2022
Order No.
Misc. Case No.296 of 2008 and STREV No.540 of 2008
- There is an inordinate delay of 1822 days in filing the revision petition. The delay is not properly explained.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition should be dismissed due to inordinate unexplained delay.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
State of Orissa represented through the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Orissa, Cuttack
- respondent
M/s Orissa Road Transport Opposite Party Corporation Ltd.
Coram
R.K. Pattanaik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court