The High Court dismissed a condonation petition for delay filed in a revision appeal due to an inordinate delay of over five years and un-cured defects. Consequently, the revision petition was also dismissed.
Condonation petition dismissed; Revision petition (STREV No.518 of 2008) dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
STREV No.518 of 2008
State of Orissa represented through the …. Petitioner Commissioner of Sales Tax, Orissa, Cuttack
Mr. Sunil Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel
-versus-
…. Orissa State Seed Corporation Opposite Party
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
21.06.2022
Order No.
Misc. Case No.257 of 2008 and STREV No.518 of 2008
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
S.K. Guin
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the condonation petition should be allowed despite inordinate delay exceeding 2017 days and uncured procedural defects.
Whether the revision petition admitted after delay should be allowed.
State of Orissa represented through Commissioner of Sales Tax, Orissa, Cuttack
Orissa State Seed Corporation Opposite Party
Justice R.K. Pattanaik
S.K. Guin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
