The revisional petition filed by Bijay Kumar Tripathy challenging a family court maintenance order was dismissed for want of prosecution due to lack of instruction to the Petitioner's counsel.
Petitioner ordered to pay maintenance to Opposite Party Nos. 2 and 3; prayer for maintenance to Opposite Party No.1 rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No. 3 OF 2011
Bijay Kumar Tripathy Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Patel, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Jyoti Pattnaik, Advocate
-versus-
…. Smt. Santilata Mishra @ Tripathy and Opp. Parties others
Mr. Maheswar Mohanty, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
06.05.2022
ms
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
Bijay Kumar Tripathy
Smt. Santilata Mishra @ Tripathy
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
