Ram Tudu v. Sana @Sanamati Tudu
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner appeared via counsel who submitted lack of instructions. Court dismissed the review application for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM NO. 35 OF 2009
Ram Tudu ..... Petitioner Ms. Suprava Dora, Advocate on behalf of Mr. R.N. Behera, Advocate -versus…. Sana @ Sanamati Tudu Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
Order No. 05.05.2022 14. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Ms. Suprava Dora, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. R.N. Behera, learned counsel for the Petitioner by filing a memo signed by Mr. R.N. Behera submits that learned counsel for the Petitioner has no instruction in the matter. Hence, she prays for withdrawal of RPFAM. The memo filed be kept on record.
- Considering the submission made and the memo filed in Court today, the RPFAM is dismissed for non-prosecution.
bks
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ram Tudu
- respondent
Sana @ Sanamati Tudu
Coram
K.R. Mohapatra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court