The petitioner in a RPFAM filed under the Constitution did not appear. The court noted the petitioner had lost interest after a stay order in a related execution case from 2009 was never pursued and listed the matter dead. Consequently, the court dismissed the RPFAM for nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM NO. 6 OF 2009
Rajendra Kumar Patra
..... Petitioner
None -versus-
Lilima Dhal
…. Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
05.05.2022
had appeared on behalf of the Petitioner, when the matter was called.
bks
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the RPFAM should be dismissed for nonprosecution due to failure to prosecute the matter after court notices.
Whether the stay order on deposit issued in a related execution case was actively pursued by the petitioner.
Rajendra Kumar Patra
Lilima Dhal
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
