This High Court dismissed an application for condonation of a 362-day delay in filing a revision petition. The Court found claims of poverty and ignorance insufficient to justify the delay.
Application for condonation of delay and the RPFAM were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No. 130 OF 2022 Imran Imam Khan ….
…. Petitioner
Mr. Akshaya Kumar Sahoo, Advocate -versus-
Sabina Bibi and another
…. Opp. Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 22.09.2022
RPFAM No.130 of 2022 & I.A. No.181 of 2022
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
ms
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the grounds of poverty and ignorance of law condone a 362-day delay in filing an RPFAM.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Imran Imam Khan
Sabina Bibi
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
