The High Court dismissed a revision petition in appeal seeking quashing of a Family Court order for maintenance due to non-prosecution by the petitioner who did not appear in court. An interim order was vacated.
RPFAM dismissed for non-prosecution and interim order dated 30th November, 2021 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No. 91 of 2021
Alok Ranjan Sethy
..… Petitioner
None
-versus-
…. Opp. Parties Mr. Rabindranath Prusty, Advocate
Sasmita Sethy and another
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
21.09.2022
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
s.s.satapathy
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition in appeal against maintenance order should be allowed when the petitioner is absent.
Alok Ranjan Sethy
Sasmita Sethy
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
