Petitioners sought to dispose a CRLMC as infructuous after final submission of the chargesheet in the original criminal case. The Single Judge allowed the petition on this ground.
CRLMC stands disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.1437 of 2016
Jindal India Thermal Power Limited, New Delhi and another
Petitioners
Mr. D.P. Sahu, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Orissa and others Opp. Parties
Mr. S.S. Pradhan, A.G.A.
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
08.12.2022
( G. Satapathy)
Judge
Priyajit
Jindal India Thermal Power Limited
State of Orissa
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
