Allowed

Kabu Biswal @ Ranjit Biswal v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC8 Dec 2022BLAPL/4948/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted bail to a petitioner accused of kidnapping and offences under the IPC and POCSO Act. The victim had been rescued and handed to police. Bail was subject to strict conditions including non-visitation of the victim's vicinity.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing bonds of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties and complying with specific reporting and exclusion conditions.

Kabu Biswal @ Ranjit Biswal Vs State of Odisha — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

BLAPL No.4948 of 2022

¶3

Kabu Biswal @ Ranjit Biswal …. Petitioner Mr. S.R. Mohapatra, Advocate

¶4

-versus-

¶5

State of Orissa

¶6

…. Opp. Party Mr. P.K. Pattnaik, AGA

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

¶9

Order No.

¶10

ORDER 08.12.2022

¶11

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

¶12

This is an application U/S. 439 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection Special G.R. Case No.53 of 2020 arising out of Paradeep P.S. Case No.137 of 2020 pending in the file of learned Additional Sessions Judge-Cum-Special Judge, Jagatsinghpur for commission of offences punishable under Sections 363/366/368 of IPC read with Section 12 of POCSO Act, on the allegation of kidnapping the victim by enticing her, but subsequently she was rescued by the father of the petitioner and handed over to the police. 3. In the course of hearing of the bail application, Mr. S.R. Mohapatra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if the allegation on record are taken into consideration, no offence is made out against the petitioner and the petitioner having detained in custody since 30.04.2022 and the victim having already handed over to the police by the father of the petitioner, the petitioner may kindly

¶13

// 2 //

¶14

be released on bail by taking into consideration the statement of the victim.

¶15

On the contrary, Mr. P.K. Pattnaik, learned A.G.A. while opposing the bail application of the petitioner vehemently by contending inter alia that the petitioner on another occasion has committed a crime again upon the victim for offence under section 6 of POCSO Act and, thereby, the petitioner is not entitled to be released on bail.

¶16

Considering the rival submissions made, taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the accusations raised against the petitioner as also the punishment prescribed for offence under section 12 of POCSO Act and keeping in view the statement of the victim and further taking into consideration the pre trial detention of the petitioner, this Court admits the petitioner to bail.

¶17

Hence, the prayer for the bail of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper with further conditions that the petitioner shall attend the trial Court on each date of posting without fail unless his attendance is dispensed with and that he shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial Court without prior permission till disposal of the case and that the petitioner shall report attendance before the Astaranga Police Station once in a week for six months preferably on Monday in between 12 Noon to 1 PM. The I.I.C. of Astaranga Police Station shall not detain the petitioner unnecessarily after recording his attendance beyond the time as stipulated. Further, it is directed that the petitioner will not visit to the

¶18

// 3 //

¶19

house or nearby area of the victim as also the school premises while on bail.

¶20

It is clarified that the Court in seisin of the case will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner without further reference to this Court, if any of the above conditions are violated or a case for cancellation of bail is otherwise made out.

¶21

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

¶22

Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules.

¶23

(G. Satapathy) Judge

¶24

Subhasmita

Kabu Biswal @ Ranjit Biswal v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kabu Biswal @ Ranjit Biswal v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanhua @ Kanhu Jena Vs State of Odisha

Binod Singh @ Gabbar Vs State of Odisha

Sailendra Munda Vs State of Odisha

Kabu Biswal @ Ranjit Biswal Vs State of Odisha

Pritish Pattnayak Vs State of Odisha

Amrut Sahu @ Amrit Vs State of Odisha