The High Court of Orissa rejected the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The court, considering the gravity of the gang rape and kidnapping allegations and the specific accusation, found no merit in the petition and refused bail.
Prayer for bail stands rejected. Trial to be expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.11587 of 2021
Sailendra Munda
…. Petitioner Mr. S. Panda , Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opp. Party Mr. S.R. Roul, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
07.12.2022
// 2 //
submits that the victim has implicated the petitioner for commission of the offences upon her and, thereby, the petitioner is not entitled to be released on bail. It is accordingly prayed by him to reject the bail application of the petitioner.
Subhasmita
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a case involving allegation of gang rape and kidnapping under Sections 323/363/376-D of IPC.
Whether the gravity of the offence and false implication bars the grant of bail at this stage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sailendra Munda
State of Orissa
G. Satpathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
