This PIL/Mandamus petition was dismissed as the petitioner had an adequate remedy under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to challenge the impugned order rejecting an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP No. 1041 OF 2022 Orissa State Handloom Weavers Co- …. Petitioner operative Society Ltd.
Mr. Durga Prasad Das, Advocate
-versus-
Bhairaba Chandra Acharya and another
…. Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
02.12.2022
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
ms
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can entertain a Constitutional Petition assailing an order under Order VII Rule 11 CPC when the remedy under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is available.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Orissa State Handloom Weavers Cooperative Society Ltd.
Bhairaba Chandra Acharya
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
