In a writ petition seeking direction to the State Information Commission, the High Court dismissed the petition because a second appeal under the Right to Information Act remains pending before the Commission regarding non-supply of information.
Writ petition dismissed outright due to pending second appeal before the State Information Commission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 30092 OF 2022
Priyadarshini Amrita Panda …. Petitioner
Mr. Gopinath Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opp. Parties Mr. Bijaya Kumar Dash, Advocate (For Information Commission) Mr. Budhiram Das, Advocate (For Opp. Party No.4)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 02.12.2022
ms
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to entertain a writ petition when a second appeal under Section 19(3) of the RTI Act remains pending before the State Information Commission
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Priyadarshini Amrita Panda
State of Odisha
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
