Petitioner challenged State Information Commission's non-supply of information via writ petition. Court noted pending second appeal to Commission and dismmissed petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 30099 OF 2022
Priyadarshini Amrita Panda …. Petitioner
Mr. Gopinath Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opp. Parties Mr. Bijaya Kumar Dash, Advocate (For Information Commission)
Mr. Budhiram Das, Advocate (For Opp. Party No.4)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 02.12.2022
ms
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether High Court should entertain writ petition for RTI direction when second appeal to State Information Commission is pending.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Priyadarshini Amrita Panda
State of Odisha
K R Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
