The High Court of Orissa disposed of a bail application under Section 439 CrPC. After hearing counsel, the bench rejected the prayer for bail due to the serious allegations of looting an armed guard during an ATM robbery, dismissing the petition.
Prayer for bail rejected; BLAPL dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.9763 of 2021
Brahmananda Senapati @ Tiki
…. Petitioner Mr. L. Mahapatra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opposite Party Mr. S. S. Mohapatra, A.S.C.
CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
18.01.2022
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
6. The BLAPL is dismissed.
( B.P. Routray)
B.K. Barik
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in an alleged robbery and assault case involving offenses under Sections 395/397 IPC and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to release on bail outside the ordinary Bail Jurisdiction under Section 439 CrPC given the severity of the charges.
5 provisions across 3 enactments
Brahmananda Senapati @ Tiki
State of Orissa
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
