This order dismisses an appeal filed by the Executing Engineer against the confirmation of a compensation decree awarding Rs. 10,00,000 to the respondents for death due to electrocution. The court found no substantial question of law or merit.
The appeal was dismissed; no ground for admitting the appeal was found.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RSA No.212 of 2019
The Executive Engineer, Electrical, …. Appellants Ganjam North Electrical Division (GNED), Southco Utility Services, AtChhatrapur, Dist.-Ganjam and others
Mr. P.K. Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
Smt. Sasmita Sahu and another
…. Respondents
CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
12.01.2022
Order No.
neither any substantial question of law nor any merit in favour of the Appellants is found.
Memo No.514, dated 7th January, 2022.
( B.P. Routray)
B.K. Barik
Page 2 of 2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether there is any merit in the appeal filed by the appellants against the decree confirming compensation for death due to electrocution.
Whether the appellants adduced any evidence to contest the claim.
Whether the impugned order of the First Appellate Court requires interference.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt. Sarla Verma and others vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and anotherExplained¶14
Smt. Sarla Verma and others vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and another, (2009) 6 SCC 121 · Who else cites this
The Executive Engineer, Electrical, Ganjam North Electrical Division, South Utility Services and others
Smt. Sasmita Sahu and another
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
