Allowed

Dipuna@ Ajit Ray v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC18 Jan 2022BLAPL/9755/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application for bail under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. in an Arms Act offence where petitioner has 11 criminal antecedents and is in custody post-charge-sheet. Court allowed bail with conditions, remitting condition-fixing to JMFC (City), Cuttack, mandating weekly appearance and prohibiting new offences.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with conditions to be fixed by JMFC (City), Cuttack, including: no new offences and weekly appearance at IIC, Chauliaganj.

Dipuna@ Ajit Ray Vs State of Odisha — Bail and Remand | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

BLAPL No.9755 of 2021

¶3

Dipuna @ Ajit Ray

¶4

…. Petitioner Mr. B.R. Mohanty, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

State of Orissa

¶7

…. Opposite Party Mr. P.K. Pattanaik, A.G.A.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER

18.01.2022

Order No.

This matter is taken up through video conferencing.

¶15

This is an application under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. for bail and the offences alleged are under Secs.25(1-A)(1-AA) of the Arms Act.

¶16

Heard Mr. B.R. Mohanty, learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as Mr. P.K. Pattanaik, learned A.G.A. for the State-Opposite Party.

¶17

It is submitted that the Petitioner is inside custody since 11.4.2021 and in the meantime investigation having been completed charge-sheet has already been submitted.

¶18

Mr. P.K. Pattanaik, learned A.G.A. for the State-Opposite Party opposes the prayer for bail of the Petitioner by submitting that the Petitioner has 11 criminal antecedents.

¶19

Page 1 of 2

¶20

However, upon hearing both the parties and considering the period of detention of the Petitioner inside custody, it is directed to release the Petitioner on bail in connection with Chauliaganj P.S. Case No.150/2021 corresponding to G.R. Case No.524/2021 on such terms and conditions to be fixed by the learned J.M.F.C. (City), Cuttack as he deems just and proper including the condition that the Petitioner shall not be involved in any other offence while on bail and shall appear before the IIC, Chauliaganj P.S. once in each week till completion of trial. It is made clear that violation of any of the conditions as fixed by this Court or by the court below shall entail cancellation of his bail.

¶21

The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

¶22

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25^th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798, dated 15^th April, 2021 and Court’s Office Order circulated vide Memo No.514, dated 7^th January, 2022.

¶23

( B.P. Routray)

¶24

Judge

¶25

B.K. Barik

¶26

Page 2 of 2

Dipuna@ Ajit Ray v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dipuna@ Ajit Ray v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Divisional Manger, M/S National Insurance Co.Ltd Vs Basanta Kumar Swain

The Executive Engineer Electrical,Ganjam Vs Sasmita Sahu

Dillip Kumar Karna Vs State of Odisha

Ajhar@ Saitan@ Sk. Ajaruddin Vs State of Odisha

Brahmananda Senapati@ Tiki Vs State of Odisha

Loka @ Sk Lokman @ Sk Muna Vs State of Odisha