Dismissed
Santosh Kumar Pradhan v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCWPC(OAC)/3625/1997
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No. 3625 of 1997
Santosh Kumar Pradhan …. Petitioner Mr. K.P. Mishra, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha and Ors. …. Opp. Parties State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
Order No. 01
ORDER 28.10.2021 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Mr. S. Rath, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. K.P. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions, since it is an old case of the year 1997, therefore the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned if any cause of action still survives. 3. With the liberty aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
GDS
Page 1 of 1
Santosh Kumar Pradhan
State of Odisha and Ors.
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court