Writ petition disposed of by invoking analogy with a previously disposed similar matter, allowing the petition based on prior judgment reasoning without detailed arguments.
Writ petition allowed based on analogy with W.P.(C) No. 19951 of 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No. 9082 of 2021
Rajesh Kumar Das …. Petitioner
Mr. B.S. Tripathy-1, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Party
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER_
28.10.2021
Order No.
03
Alok
( Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
Page 1 of 1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.(C) No. 19951 of 2020Referred¶16
Rajesh Kumar Das
State of Odisha & Ors.
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
B.R. Sarangi
Parties & counsel
