Petitioner's counsel stated no instructions for the old 1997 writ petition. The High Court disposed of the petition with liberty to approach the concerned authority if any cause of action survives. No substantive issue was decided.
The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to approach the concerned authority if any cause of action still survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No. 3624 of 1997
Laxmidhar Sahu
…. Petitioner Mr. K.P. Mishra, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha and Ors. …. Opp. Parties State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
Order No.
01
ORDER 28.10.2021 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Mr. S. Rath, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. K.P. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions, since it is an old case of the year 1997, therefore the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned if any cause of action still survives. 3. With the liberty aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
GDS
Page 1 of 1
Laxmidhar Sahu
State of Odisha
DR. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
