Petitioner sought direction for service benefits under O.R.S.P. Rule and R.A.C.P. Court disposed petition granting liberty to file fresh representation before authority for consideration within mandated time limits.
Liberty granted to file fresh representation before the authority to ventilate grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OA) No. 986 of 2015
Dinabandhu Barik
…. Petitioner
Mr. R. Rath, Adv.
-Versus -
State of Odisha & others …. Opposite Parties
Mr. N.K. Praharj, learned Standing Counsel for the State
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
25.08.2021
Order No.
1
Page 1 of 1
ventilating his grievance within a period of two weeks. If such representation is filed within the time stipulated, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the said authority in accordance with law within a period of three months thereafter.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
A.K. Rana
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to benefit under 2nd and 3rd ACP and benefits under R.A.C.P based on his completed service years.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dinabandhu Barik
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
