This is a writ petition where the petitioner sought a direction for his promotion to Headmaster Level-IV. The court dismissed the petition finding no merit due to service irregularities and lack of eligibility.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OA) No. 323 of 2002
Debaraj Sahoo
..... Petitioner
Mr.Ramakanta Sahoo, Advocate
- Versus-
State of Odisha & Ors. ….. Opp. Parties
Mr. S.Jena, Standing Counsel for S&ME Dept.,
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
25.08.2021
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 01 2. Heard Mr. R.K. Bisoi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Ramakanta Sahoo, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. S. Jena, learned Standing Counsel for School and Mass Education Department.
2
Rules, 1997.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
GDS
3
4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to consideration for promotion to the post of Headmaster given service irregularities during 1961-63.
Whether the petitioner can claim promotion and benefits under the Orissa Elementary Education Rules, 1997.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Debaraj Sahoo
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
